Every UAE company follows the law. They accrue for end-of-service benefits. They recognise the liability. They disclose it in the financials. On paper, everything looks disciplined.

But here is the uncomfortable truth: most companies do not actually hold the cash.

Provisioning is not protection. Cash is.

The Illusion of Provisioning

The EOSB liability sits on the balance sheet. The accounting is correct. The disclosure is compliant. But the cash that would fund a simultaneous exit of a significant portion of the workforce? In most UAE companies, it does not exist in a ring-fenced form. It has been deployed into operations, used for working capital, or absorbed into the business.

Let’s put real numbers to it.

📊 EOSB Liability Illustration — Mid-Sized UAE Company
Number of employees200
Average monthly salaryAED 12,000
Average tenure5 years
EOSB per employee (approx.)AED 60,000–75,000
Total EOSB liabilityAED 12–15 million

Now ask the real question: how many UAE companies are holding AED 12–15 million in accessible cash against this obligation?

Very few. Because the system is built on a single assumption: not everyone will leave at the same time. And most of the time, that assumption holds. Until it doesn’t.

The scale of the obligation — UAE market
AED 12–15MTypical EOSB liability for a 200-person company at AED 12K avg salary
0%Required cash funding under current UAE law — accrual is sufficient
StructuralThe shift from unfunded to funded — not if, but when

When the Model Breaks

The unfunded liability model works in normal conditions. The problem is that normal conditions are precisely when you don’t need to think about it. The crisis arrives when:

⚠ The four scenarios where EOSB becomes a cash crisis

1. Cash flow tightens — employees who sense instability start leaving, triggering EOSB payouts at the worst possible moment.

2. Business restructuring — deliberate headcount reduction crystallises the liability in a single quarter.

3. Rapid growth reversal — a business that grew quickly has a large, young workforce with shorter tenures but significant aggregate liability.

4. Insolvency — the most serious scenario. EOSB creditors are priority claimants. The liability that sat quietly on the balance sheet becomes the first call on whatever cash remains.

In each scenario, the “accrued liability” on the balance sheet becomes a real cash obligation simultaneously. The company that has been using those funds for operations suddenly faces a liquidity cliff it cannot absorb.

A Quiet Policy Shift Is Already Happening

The UAE Voluntary End-of-Service Benefits Savings Scheme is more significant than its name suggests. On the surface, it is optional. In substance, it signals a direction of travel that every CFO should be mapping.

The scheme moves EOSB from an unfunded promise held by the employer to a funded, ring-fenced pool managed by regulated investment entities. Employees gain capital protection. The government gains access to long-term pooled capital. And companies lose something they may not even have recognised they had.

👤
For Employees
Capital protection even if employer fails. Potential investment returns. Portability across employers. Inflation hedge over long tenures.
🏛
For Government
Access to long-term pooled capital for deployment into investment structures. Reduced social risk from employer insolvency. Financial system deepening.
🏢
For Companies
Loss of liquidity flexibility. Increased cash discipline required. Higher working capital pressure. Treasury strategies must be restructured.

The CFO Reality: Losing the Invisible Float

Today, EOSB is a non-cash liability. In practice, it functions as a silent funding source — the cash stays within the business, used for operations, expansion, or debt servicing. Most CFOs do not think of it this way explicitly. But that is what it is: an interest-free, unsecured loan from future employees to the current business.

If funding becomes mandatory, that arrangement ends. The cash must leave the business and enter a regulated vehicle. For a company with AED 15 million in EOSB exposure, that is not an accounting entry. That is a balance sheet shock with real cash flow implications.

📋 What CFOs need to stress-test now

  • Calculate your total EOSB liability at current headcount and tenure — the exact number, not an estimate
  • Model the cash impact of mandatory funding over 3 years — phased contributions vs lump sum
  • Identify which working capital lines currently benefit from the EOSB float — what replaces them
  • Review bank facility headroom — mandatory EOSB funding reduces your covenant flexibility
  • Assess voluntary participation now — early movers control the timing, late movers absorb the shock

The Bigger Question

This is not about compliance. Every company will comply when they have to. This is about control of capital.

The companies that adapt early will restructure their treasury, adjust their working capital planning, and absorb the transition gradually. The companies that treat this as a future problem will face it as a sudden constraint on liquidity — at exactly the moment when they have the least flexibility to absorb it.

The direction is clear. The EOSB scheme’s voluntary launch is the policy signal. The mandatory phase is a question of when, not if.

The question every UAE CFO should answer this week

1. If EOSB funding became mandatory tomorrow — how much liquidity does your business actually lose?
2. Which of your current operations are implicitly funded by that float — and what replaces it?
3. Is your board aware that this liability exists, is unfunded, and is moving toward regulation?

Most finance teams treat EOSB as a liability they will deal with when needed. That mindset works — until the system changes. And when it does, the shift won’t be gradual. It will be structural.

TS
Tariq Salam
CFO · Turnaround Specialist · ACCA · ICAEW · UAE Golden Visa
Over 20 years of CFO and finance leadership experience across the UAE and GCC. The Finance Leadership series publishes practical, practitioner-led CFO insights every week — written from the front line, not a consulting report.
Continue reading